Interaction Effects

Interaction effects occur when the effect of one variable on a dependent variable depends on the level of another variable. In the context of A/B testing, interaction effects can occur when the impact of one experiment is influenced by the presence of another experiment.

For example, consider two experiments: Experiment A tests a new color for a "Buy Now" button, and Experiment B tests a new placement for the same button. If the experiments are run separately, they might both show positive results. However, if they are run simultaneously, the combination of the new color and new placement might confuse users and lead to negative results. This is an example of an interaction effect.

In the context of overlapping A/B tests, interaction effects can increase variance and skew results. However, strong interaction effects are rare. It is more common to find smaller non-linear results.

While these can skew the final numbers, it’s rare to find two experiments collide to produce outright misleading results. Effects are generally additive which leads to clean “ship or no ship” decisions. Even when numbers are skewed, they are in the same ballpark and result in the same decisions; overlapping experiments can be trusted to generate directionally accurate results.

Interaction effects that lead to broken experiences are fairly predictable. Broken experiences or strong interaction effects typically occur at the surface level, eg. a single web page or a feature within an app. At most companies, these are usually controlled by a single team and teams are generally aware of what experiments are running and planned. Interaction effects are easily anticipated and can be managed at the team level.

Here's an example of an interaction effect that could break the user experience:

  • Experiment 1: Moves the “Save File” Button to a menu

  • Experiment 2: Simplifies the UI by hiding the menu

If these two experiments are run simultaneously, they could combine to confuse users, as the "Save File" button would effectively be hidden. This is an example of an interaction effect that breaks the user experience, and should be avoided.

Join the #1 Community for Product Experimentation

Connect with like-minded product leaders, data scientists, and engineers to share the latest in product experimentation.

Try Statsig Today

Get started for free. Add your whole team!

What builders love about us

OpenAI OpenAI
Brex Brex
Notion Notion
SoundCloud SoundCloud
Ancestry Ancestry
At OpenAI, we want to iterate as fast as possible. Statsig enables us to grow, scale, and learn efficiently. Integrating experimentation with product analytics and feature flagging has been crucial for quickly understanding and addressing our users' top priorities.
Dave Cummings
Engineering Manager, ChatGPT
Brex's mission is to help businesses move fast. Statsig is now helping our engineers move fast. It has been a game changer to automate the manual lift typical to running experiments and has helped product teams ship the right features to their users quickly.
Karandeep Anand
At Notion, we're continuously learning what our users value and want every team to run experiments to learn more. It’s also critical to maintain speed as a habit. Statsig's experimentation platform enables both this speed and learning for us.
Mengying Li
Data Science Manager
We evaluated Optimizely, LaunchDarkly, Split, and Eppo, but ultimately selected Statsig due to its comprehensive end-to-end integration. We wanted a complete solution rather than a partial one, including everything from the stats engine to data ingestion.
Don Browning
SVP, Data & Platform Engineering
We only had so many analysts. Statsig provided the necessary tools to remove the bottleneck. I know that we are able to impact our key business metrics in a positive way with Statsig. We are definitely heading in the right direction with Statsig.
Partha Sarathi
Director of Engineering
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
Privacy Policy