Platform
Resources
A faster alternative to AB Tasty: Statsig
When your team runs dozens of experiments monthly, the difference between a platform that ships results in days versus weeks compounds quickly. AB Tasty built their reputation serving enterprise marketers with visual tools and high-touch support, but that approach creates friction for technical teams who need to move fast.
Statsig takes the opposite approach: give engineers direct access to Facebook-grade experimentation infrastructure without the enterprise sales process. The contrast becomes clear when you look at pricing transparency, implementation timelines, and how each platform handles scale. Let's dig into what actually matters when choosing between these tools.
Company backgrounds and platform overview
Statsig's origin story starts with Vijaye Raji leaving Facebook to democratize their experimentation infrastructure. He spent eight months building without customers before former colleagues recognized what he'd created. Today, the platform processes over 1 trillion events daily for companies like OpenAI, Notion, and Microsoft.
AB Tasty serves 1,000+ brands including Disney, L'Oréal, and Sephora. They've built their platform around combining A/B testing with personalization tools and AI features. Their EmotionsAI technology aims to transform emotional signals into sales insights - a clear signal of their marketing-first approach.
The philosophical differences run deep. Statsig builds for engineers who need:
Statistical rigor with CUPED variance reduction
Complete data transparency via one-click SQL queries
Warehouse-native deployment for data governance
Unlimited feature flags at any scale
AB Tasty targets marketers looking for visual editors and no-code campaign builders. Both platforms evolved from their founders' experiences - Raji from Facebook's data-obsessed culture, AB Tasty from digital marketing optimization needs. These origins shape everything from UI design to pricing models.
Paul Ellwood from OpenAI puts it simply: "Statsig's infrastructure and experimentation workflows have been crucial in helping us scale to hundreds of experiments across hundreds of millions of users."
Feature and capability deep dive
Core experimentation capabilities
Professional experimentation requires more than basic A/B testing. Statsig implements CUPED for variance reduction, sequential testing, and both Bayesian and Frequentist methodologies. You get the same statistical engine Facebook uses internally. AB Tasty provides standard A/B and multivariate testing enhanced by their EmotionsAI technology.
The feature flag difference hits budgets hard. Statsig offers unlimited free flags regardless of scale - you could run millions without paying extra. AB Tasty bundles flags within premium tiers, forcing teams to pay more just to use basic progressive rollouts alongside experiments.
This pricing structure creates real friction. Say your team wants to:
Test a new checkout flow with 10% of users
Gate the feature behind a flag for quick rollback
Monitor performance metrics in real-time
With Statsig, that's free. With AB Tasty, you're negotiating enterprise contracts.
Analytics and data infrastructure
Scale determines what's actually possible. Statsig processes over 1 trillion events daily with warehouse-native options for Snowflake, BigQuery, and Databricks. Teams keep their data where they want it while maintaining sub-second query performance.
AB Tasty focuses on built-in analytics without warehouse integration. For startups, that simplicity might work. But enterprise teams hit walls when they can't join experiment data with their existing warehouse or maintain compliance requirements.
Don Browning from SoundCloud explained their choice: "We evaluated Optimizely, LaunchDarkly, Split, and Eppo, but ultimately selected Statsig due to its comprehensive end-to-end integration. We wanted a complete solution rather than a partial one, including everything from the stats engine to data ingestion."
The transparency gap matters too. Statsig exposes one-click SQL queries for every calculation - you can verify any metric yourself. AB Tasty emphasizes AI-driven insights and automated recommendations instead. Pick your preference: direct data access or black-box suggestions.
Pricing models and cost analysis
Transparent versus custom pricing
Statsig publishes exact pricing that scales only with analytics events. You get 2M events monthly free with unlimited seats and feature flags. No sales calls, no negotiation games.
AB Tasty requires custom quotes for everything. Industry reports show average contracts around $45,000-60,000 annually, though prices vary based on mysterious factors like "support level" and projected usage.
The opacity creates planning nightmares. How do you budget for experimentation when you can't predict costs? Teams often discover hidden fees for basic features they assumed were included.
Real-world cost scenarios
Let's run the numbers for a typical SaaS company. With 100K monthly active users generating standard metrics (20 sessions per user, 5 events per session), you produce about 10M events monthly.
Statsig's cost: $0. Still within the free tier.
AB Tasty's cost: Around $45,000 per year minimum.
Scale up to 1M MAU generating 100M events monthly:
Statsig: ~$1,000/month with enterprise volume discounts
AB Tasty: Likely exceeding $100,000 annually
Even with typical 22% negotiation savings, AB Tasty costs 5-10x more. And remember - Statsig's pricing includes unlimited feature flags while AB Tasty charges extra for them.
Decision factors and implementation considerations
Time-to-value and onboarding
Speed matters when your competitors ship daily. Statsig's 30+ SDKs get you running experiments within hours. One engineer can integrate the platform, launch a test, and see results before lunch.
AB Tasty delivers enterprise onboarding with dedicated customer success teams. They'll guide you through multiple implementation phases, training sessions, and review cycles. Great for large organizations with complex approval processes - painful for teams that value autonomy.
A G2 reviewer captured the difference: "Implementing on our CDN edge and in our nextjs app was straight-forward and seamless." No consultants, no multi-week timelines.
The self-service model particularly benefits:
Startups iterating quickly
Teams practicing continuous deployment
Engineers who prefer documentation over meetings
Organizations with limited experimentation experience
Scalability and enterprise readiness
Future-proofing your experimentation platform prevents costly migrations. Statsig handles 2.5 billion unique monthly experiment subjects with 99.99% uptime. The same infrastructure powering OpenAI's experiments works for your 10-person startup.
AB Tasty serves over 1,000 brands but doesn't publish infrastructure metrics. Their focus stays on the digital experience layer rather than raw data processing power. Fine for marketing campaigns; limiting for product experimentation at scale.
Warehouse-native deployment becomes critical for governance. Companies with strict compliance requirements need data control. Statsig supports:
Snowflake deployment
BigQuery integration
Databricks compatibility
Custom warehouse solutions
AB Tasty operates only as a hosted solution. Your experiment data lives in their cloud, following their retention policies.
As a G2 reviewer noted: "Customers have loved Warehouse Native because it helps their data team accelerate experimentation without giving up control."
Bottom line: why is Statsig a viable alternative to AB Tasty?
Statsig delivers Facebook-grade experimentation infrastructure without enterprise pricing games. Where AB Tasty's contracts start around $60,000 annually, Statsig offers transparent usage-based pricing. You pay for analytics events and session replays - feature flags stay free at any scale.
Technical teams gain immediate advantages with Statsig's developer-first design. The platform provides:
30+ SDKs for every major language
Warehouse-native deployment options
Direct SQL access to all calculations
Unlimited free feature flags
Sub-second performance at trillion-event scale
AB Tasty excels at serving marketers with visual tools and pre-built widgets. But that focus creates friction for engineering teams who need programmatic control and transparency.
Paul Ellwood from OpenAI summarized the difference: "Statsig's infrastructure and experimentation workflows have been crucial in helping us scale to hundreds of experiments across hundreds of millions of users."
The unified platform eliminates costly tool sprawl. Instead of juggling separate services for flags, experiments, and analytics, everything works together. This integration especially benefits teams practicing trunk-based development where feature flags and experiments intertwine.
Growing companies avoid future platform migrations by starting with infrastructure that scales. The same Statsig setup handling your first experiment can process billions of events without architectural changes. No surprise enterprise tiers, no renegotiation cycles - just predictable growth.
Closing thoughts
Choosing between Statsig and AB Tasty comes down to your team's DNA. Marketing-heavy organizations might prefer AB Tasty's visual tools and white-glove support. But if you're building products where speed and technical control matter, Statsig offers a faster path to meaningful experiment results.
The pricing transparency alone saves weeks of vendor negotiations. Add warehouse-native deployment, unlimited feature flags, and Facebook-proven infrastructure, and the choice becomes clearer for technical teams.
Want to explore further? Check out Statsig's documentation to see the platform in action, or dive into their experimentation best practices learned from processing trillions of events.
Hope you find this useful!