Mixed-method experimentation (Quantitative and qualitative)

Thu Nov 07 2024

Ever wonder how combining different research methods can give you deeper insights into your users?

Mixing quantitative data with qualitative feedback isn't just a cool idea—it's a powerful way to understand complex problems from all angles.

By blending numbers and narratives, you get a fuller picture that's essential for making evidence-based decisions.

Introduction to mixed-method experimentation

Mixed-method experimentation brings together quantitative and qualitative research methods to provide richer insights. By combining different types of data, you gain a comprehensive understanding of complex research problems. This approach plays a crucial role in product development and data science, helping teams make informed, evidence-based decisions.

This method is especially valuable when studying multifaceted phenomena. It lets you examine different aspects of a problem at the same time, giving you a more complete picture. In fields like product development, understanding user behavior and preferences is paramount, and mixed methods offer the holistic view you need.

The real power of mixed-method experimentation lies in its ability to triangulate findings. Quantitative data, like metrics from A/B tests, provide objective measures of user behavior. On the other hand, qualitative data—user interviews and feedback—offer context and explanations for those behaviors. When you combine them, you create a robust evidence base for decision-making.

Implementing this approach requires careful planning. You need to consider the strengths and limitations of each method, making sure they complement each other effectively. This often involves designing studies that collect both quantitative and qualitative data either at the same time or in sequence, depending on your research goals.

As organizations like Statsig increasingly recognize the value of data-driven decision-making, mixed-method experimentation has become an essential tool. By leveraging both qualitative and quantitative approaches, teams can navigate complex challenges and create products that truly resonate with users. Embracing this methodology can help bridge the experimentation gap and foster a culture of continuous learning and improvement.

When to choose mixed methods over singular approaches

So when should you opt for mixed methods instead of sticking to just quantitative or qualitative approaches? Quantitative methods are great for identifying trends and patterns but often lack context. Qualitative approaches provide depth but might not be generalizable. Mixed methods research combines both, allowing you to tackle complex questions more comprehensively.

Consider mixed methods when quantitative or qualitative data alone can't fully answer your research question. Scenarios where this approach shines include:

  • Investigating a new product or feature with limited user data

  • Designing for unfamiliar user segments or cultural contexts

  • Diagnosing unexpected user behavior or test results

Heuristics for choosing mixed methods include factors like product stage, sample size, and cultural context. Early-stage products benefit from qualitative insights, while mature products might rely more on quantitative data. If you're dealing with a smaller user base, qualitative methods can offer valuable insights. For larger audiences, quantitative techniques like A/B testing come into play.

By capturing numerical trends and exploring user motivations and experiences, mixed methods help you understand the "why" behind user actions. Combining hard data with human insights allows you to navigate complex situations effectively and create products that resonate with your audience.

At Statsig, we often find that balancing both quantitative and qualitative inputs is key to refining our products. By understanding not just what users are doing, but why they're doing it, we can make more informed decisions that lead to better outcomes.

Designing effective mixed-method experiments

Designing a mixed-method experiment isn't just about throwing together some surveys and analytics. Mixed-methods designs integrate qualitative and quantitative approaches to provide comprehensive insights. Choosing the right design depends on your research question and objectives. Some common mixed-methods designs include:

  • Convergent parallel: Collecting and analyzing qualitative and quantitative data separately, then merging the results

  • Embedded: Collecting both data types at the same time, with qualitative data supplementing quantitative findings

  • Explanatory sequential: Collecting quantitative data first, followed by qualitative data to explain the results

  • Exploratory sequential: Collecting qualitative data to explore a topic, then quantitative data to generalize the findings

Integrating qualitative and quantitative data is crucial for drawing unified conclusions. Strategies for doing this include triangulation (comparing findings from different sources), following a thread (exploring a finding across data types), and using a mixed methods matrix to systematically combine data.

What happens when your qualitative and quantitative results don't quite align? That's okay—it requires a nuanced approach. Consider the strengths and limitations of each data type, and use qualitative insights to contextualize quantitative findings. Remember, human behavior is complex, and sometimes the numbers and narratives tell different parts of the same story.

Effective mixed-method experiments require careful planning and execution. Start by clearly defining your research question and selecting the appropriate design. Make sure the qualitative and quantitative components are well-integrated and aligned with your objectives. Continuously assess the quality and trustworthiness of your data, and be open to adapting your approach as needed.

The goal here is to gain a holistic understanding of your users and their needs. By combining the depth of qualitative insights with the breadth of quantitative data, you can make informed decisions that drive meaningful improvements in your product or service. As Margaret-Ann Seger notes, balancing qualitative vs quantitative inputs is key to success in product development.

Applications and benefits of mixed-method experimentation

Mixed-method experimentation offers a powerful toolkit for enhancing product decisions and user experiences. Companies like Shopify, Netflix, and Booking.com have leveraged mixed methods to gain deeper insights into user behavior and preferences.

By combining the breadth of quantitative data with the depth of qualitative insights, mixed methods enable teams to diagnose issues more effectively. This approach helps prioritize hypotheses and sharpen execution, leading to more successful experiments and product improvements.

Mixed-method experimentation provides robust evidence for key decisions, fostering a data-informed culture that balances hard data with human expertise. This is especially valuable in uncertain environments where adaptability is crucial.

Embracing mixed methods can bridge the "experimentation gap" that many organizations face, transforming decision-making into a scientific process. By rigorously testing ideas through a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods, teams can prevent the implementation of potentially detrimental changes.

At Statsig, we've seen firsthand how mixed-method experimentation enhances our understanding of user behavior. By integrating user feedback with quantitative metrics, we can make more informed decisions that lead to better products.

Closing thoughts

Mixing quantitative and qualitative methods isn't just about gathering more data—it's about getting better insights. Mixed-method experimentation gives you a fuller picture of your users and helps you make decisions that truly make a difference. By embracing this approach, you're setting your team up for success in navigating complex challenges and creating products that resonate.

If you're interested in learning more about mixed methods and how they can benefit your team, check out our other resources on the topic. We're always here to help you on your journey to better experimentation.

Request a demo

Statsig's experts are on standby to answer any questions about experimentation at your organization.
request a demo cta image


Try Statsig Today

Get started for free. Add your whole team!
We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.
Privacy Policy