Products
Solutions
Resources
An alternative to LaunchDarkly for experimentation: Statsig
Feature flags started as simple on/off switches for code. Today, they're the backbone of sophisticated experimentation programs at companies like Netflix, Spotify, and Airbnb. But here's the problem: most feature flag platforms weren't built for experimentation—they bolt on A/B testing as an afterthought, leaving teams to cobble together analytics tools, statistical engines, and flag management systems.
LaunchDarkly pioneered the feature flag space, but their platform reflects this legacy architecture. If you're serious about experimentation, you need a platform built from the ground up with testing in mind. That's where the fundamental difference between LaunchDarkly and Statsig becomes clear.
Company backgrounds and platform overview
Statsig emerged from Facebook's experimentation culture in 2020. Vijaye Raji, former Facebook VP, founded the company after watching teams struggle with enterprise-grade testing tools. His team spent eight months building the core platform before landing their first customer—a deliberate choice to get the foundations right.
LaunchDarkly took a different path. They pioneered feature flag management in 2014, focusing first on release management. The company expanded into experimentation and analytics years later, adding these capabilities to their existing flag infrastructure.
These origin stories aren't just history lessons—they shaped each platform's DNA. LaunchDarkly approaches experimentation through a feature management lens: flags come first, testing follows. Statsig builds from an experimentation-first philosophy where flags, analytics, and testing work as a unified system. This isn't a subtle distinction. It affects everything from pricing models to statistical capabilities.
Take pricing as an example. LaunchDarkly charges for feature flag usage through MAU, service connections, and gate checks—costs that compound quickly. Statsig offers unlimited free feature flags at any scale. You only pay for analytics events, which aligns costs with actual experimentation value rather than infrastructure overhead.
The platforms also diverge in deployment options. Statsig offers both cloud-hosted and warehouse-native deployments, letting teams keep data in their own infrastructure. LaunchDarkly recently introduced warehouse analytics but maintains a primarily cloud-based architecture that routes data through their systems.
Feature and capability deep dive
Experimentation and statistical capabilities
Here's where the experimentation-first philosophy pays dividends. Statsig ships with CUPED variance reduction, sequential testing, and stratified sampling built in. These aren't buzzwords—they're the difference between waiting weeks for results versus getting reliable insights in days.
LaunchDarkly provides basic A/B testing: split traffic, measure results, declare winners. That works for simple tests, but falls apart when you need:
Faster results from smaller sample sizes
Protection against false positives from peeking
Variance reduction to detect subtle effects
Automated statistical corrections for multiple comparisons
Both platforms support feature flags, but implementation differs dramatically. Statsig includes unlimited free flags at every tier—no MAU calculations, no gate check counting. LaunchDarkly's pricing escalates with usage, creating perverse incentives to limit experimentation.
Paul Ellwood from OpenAI's data engineering team puts it plainly: "Statsig's experimentation capabilities stand apart from other platforms we've evaluated. Statsig's infrastructure and experimentation workflows have been crucial in helping us scale to hundreds of experiments across hundreds of millions of users."
Analytics and data infrastructure
Statsig supports warehouse-native deployment for Snowflake, BigQuery, and Databricks. This isn't just about data residency—it's about maintaining complete control over your experimentation data. Teams can run custom analyses, join experiment results with internal datasets, and maintain compliance without data leaving their infrastructure.
LaunchDarkly's cloud-only model forces data through their infrastructure. They recently added Product Analytics as a separate module, but it's clearly an addition rather than core functionality. Statsig built integrated analytics from day one. Product analytics, session replay, and user journey mapping share the same data model. You analyze identical metrics across experiments, feature rollouts, and general product usage—no reconciliation headaches.
The scale differences matter too. Statsig processes over 1 trillion events daily with 99.99% uptime. This isn't theoretical capacity; it's proven scale supporting OpenAI, Microsoft, and other data-intensive companies without performance degradation.
Pricing models and cost analysis
Pricing structure comparison
LaunchDarkly's pricing creates sticker shock for growing companies. The Foundation tier costs $8.33 per 1,000 MAU or $10 per service connection monthly. Sounds reasonable until you do the math. Enterprise customers face custom pricing that Reddit users discovered often exceeds $40,000 annually for applications with millions of sessions.
Statsig's event-based pricing aligns costs with experimentation value. You get unlimited feature flags, unlimited seats, and 50,000 free session replays monthly. The only variable is analytics events—the actual data powering your experiments. No surprise bills when user growth accelerates. No penalty for thorough testing.
Real-world cost scenarios
Let's run the numbers. Consider a typical B2C app with 100,000 MAU:
Each user generates 20 sessions monthly
Each session includes 10 gate checks
Total: 2 million sessions, 20 million gate checks
LaunchDarkly's Foundation tier would cost approximately $833 monthly just for the MAU component. Add service connections and enterprise features, and costs balloon quickly.
Statsig's analysis shows the same usage often falls within their generous free tier. Even with paid events, teams typically save 50% or more compared to traditional feature flag platforms. The savings compound at scale—LaunchDarkly becomes the most expensive option after 100K MAU.
Real companies see real savings. Brex reduced costs by over 20% while consolidating multiple tools into Statsig's unified platform. The transparent pricing means finance teams can actually forecast costs as products grow.
Decision factors and implementation considerations
Developer experience and onboarding
Both platforms offer 30+ SDKs across major languages and frameworks. But SDK count doesn't tell the whole story. Statsig provides transparent SQL queries with one-click visibility into how metrics calculate. Edge computing support delivers sub-millisecond flag evaluations. LaunchDarkly emphasizes comprehensive documentation and traditional onboarding—solid but conventional.
Speed to first experiment separates the platforms. Statsig customers report launching experiments within weeks of implementation. Runna launched over 100 experiments in their first year—a velocity impossible with complex setup requirements. LaunchDarkly's governance workflows add safety but extend timelines, especially for teams prioritizing experimentation over release management.
Developer empowerment looks different too. Statsig enables self-service analytics without SQL knowledge. Engineers can dig into results immediately. LaunchDarkly's new product analytics requires warehouse integration first—another barrier between teams and insights.
Enterprise readiness and support
LaunchDarkly's Guardian tier emphasizes release monitoring with automatic remediation and health metrics. These features matter for deployment safety but don't directly improve experimentation capabilities. Statsig delivers 99.99% uptime while processing trillions of daily events—reliability that comes from building for Facebook-scale from the start.
Both platforms meet enterprise security standards: SOC 2, GDPR compliance, SSO integration. The difference lies in support philosophy. Statsig offers Slack-based support where you might interact directly with the CEO. LaunchDarkly follows traditional tiered enterprise support. Brex engineers noted they're "significantly happier" with Statsig's hands-on problem-solving approach.
Scale considerations reveal architectural differences:
Statsig handles 2.5 billion unique monthly experiment subjects without degradation
LaunchDarkly's Flag Delivery Architecture ensures consistent global delivery
Statsig's warehouse-native option keeps data processing close to storage
LaunchDarkly charges based on MAU, potentially limiting high-traffic experiments
Bottom line: why is Statsig a viable alternative to LaunchDarkly?
Statsig delivers Facebook-grade experimentation infrastructure at 50% lower cost than LaunchDarkly. But cost savings tell only part of the story. The real value comes from a platform built specifically for experimentation rather than adapted to it.
You get unlimited feature flags without MAU penalties. Integrated analytics that actually work together. Warehouse-native deployment for complete data control. LaunchDarkly charges separately for each capability; Statsig bundles everything because that's how experimentation actually works.
The technical advantages compound for sophisticated testing programs:
CUPED variance reduction cuts experiment runtime by 30-50%
Sequential testing prevents false positives from early peeking
Stratified sampling ensures representative test groups
Automated statistical corrections handle multiple comparisons
Companies running serious experimentation programs have noticed. OpenAI, Notion, and Brex switched to Statsig specifically for these capabilities. As Don Browning, SVP at SoundCloud, explained: "We evaluated Optimizely, LaunchDarkly, Split, and Eppo, but ultimately selected Statsig due to its comprehensive end-to-end integration."
LaunchDarkly remains strong for pure release management workflows. If you need gradual rollouts, kill switches, and deployment control, they pioneered these patterns. But if experimentation drives your product development—if you need statistical rigor, integrated analytics, and sustainable pricing—Statsig provides superior value. The G2 reviews consistently highlight this unified platform advantage.
Closing thoughts
Choosing between LaunchDarkly and Statsig isn't really about feature flags—it's about your experimentation philosophy. Do you want a release management platform with testing capabilities added on? Or do you need a purpose-built experimentation platform that happens to include world-class feature flags?
For teams serious about testing, the answer becomes clear. Statsig's experimentation-first approach, transparent pricing, and proven scale make it the natural choice for data-driven product development.
Want to dig deeper? Check out:
Hope you find this useful!