Most experimentation platforms started as A/B testing tools for marketers, then bolted on features as customer demands evolved. VWO exemplifies this pattern - what began as a conversion optimization tool now sprawls across multiple products with separate pricing, interfaces, and workflows.
This fragmentation creates real problems. Teams struggle to connect insights across tools, costs balloon with each added module, and what should be simple experiments become complex multi-tool orchestrations. Statsig took a different approach: build an integrated platform from day one, designed for modern product teams who need experimentation, feature management, and analytics working together seamlessly.
VWO emerged from the conversion rate optimization world, building tools for marketers to test website variations. Their visual editors and pre-built templates help marketing teams optimize landing pages without touching code. The platform works well for its original purpose - but product development demands different capabilities.
Statsig's founders came from Facebook, where they built the experimentation infrastructure that powers billions of users. They saw how internal tools like Deltoid and Scuba enabled Facebook to run thousands of concurrent experiments. Rather than keep this advantage locked inside big tech, they rebuilt it for everyone else. This engineering-first DNA shaped every architectural decision.
The platforms naturally serve different audiences. VWO excels at helping marketers run website tests with heatmaps and session recordings. Statsig provides the infrastructure product and engineering teams need for complex experiments across web, mobile, and backend systems. You can see this distinction in their customer bases: VWO lists marketing agencies and e-commerce sites; Statsig powers OpenAI, Microsoft, and Notion.
"Statsig's experimentation capabilities stand apart from other platforms we've evaluated. Statsig's infrastructure and experimentation workflows have been crucial in helping us scale to hundreds of experiments across hundreds of millions of users."
Paul Ellwood, Data Engineering, OpenAI
The pricing models reflect these different philosophies. VWO charges based on monthly visitors - a metric that makes sense for website optimization but breaks down for mobile apps or backend services. Statsig uses event-based pricing that scales with actual usage. No seat limits. No visitor caps. Just transparent billing based on what you actually process.
Here's where the platforms diverge sharply. VWO offers the standard trio: A/B tests, multivariate tests, and split URL tests. These work fine for testing button colors or headline variations. But modern product teams need more sophisticated techniques.
Statsig provides sequential testing for continuous monitoring without p-value inflation. Switchback testing handles marketplace dynamics where user actions affect each other. Stratified sampling ensures balanced groups even with skewed populations. These aren't academic exercises - they're practical tools that increase experiment velocity and reduce sample size requirements.
The deployment flexibility matters too. Statsig offers both cloud-hosted and warehouse-native options. Teams can maintain complete data control while still leveraging advanced experimentation. VWO only provides hosted solutions, which limits options for organizations with strict data residency requirements or existing warehouse investments.
VWO focuses narrowly on conversion metrics and user flows. You get funnel analysis, heatmaps, and basic segmentation. Statsig delivers comprehensive product analytics: cohort retention curves, custom metric builders, and SQL access to raw data. The difference becomes obvious when you need to understand not just if users converted, but how their behavior changed over weeks or months.
Developer experience shapes adoption speed. Statsig maintains 30+ open-source SDKs covering every major platform. Edge computing support means feature flags evaluate at CDN locations for minimal latency. VWO's integration story centers on web - mobile and backend teams often find themselves building custom solutions.
Both platforms support frequentist statistics, but that's where VWO stops. Statsig adds Bayesian inference for cases where priors improve decision-making. CUPED variance reduction can cut required sample sizes by 50% or more. Bonferroni correction prevents false positives when running multiple comparisons.
These aren't just checkboxes on a feature list. Brex's data science team cut their workload in half because Statsig handles the statistical heavy lifting automatically. No more building custom analysis pipelines or second-guessing significance calculations.
VWO includes basic feature toggles - you can turn things on or off. Statsig provides enterprise-grade feature management that rivals dedicated platforms. Percentage rollouts let you gradually expose features. Environment-specific targeting keeps staging separate from production. Automatic rollbacks trigger when metrics exceed thresholds.
The integration between experimentation and feature management creates powerful workflows:
Launch features behind flags
Run experiments on flag exposure
Monitor metrics continuously
Rollback automatically if things go wrong
This safety net becomes critical at scale. Notion runs over 300 experiments per quarter - manual monitoring would be impossible.
VWO handles moderate traffic loads adequately. Their infrastructure supports typical website volumes without issues. But what happens when you're processing billions of events daily?
Statsig runs on the same infrastructure principles as Facebook's internal systems. The platform processes over 1 trillion events daily with 99.99% uptime. This isn't theoretical capacity - it's proven performance from customers like OpenAI and Microsoft.
The architectural differences show up in pricing too. VWO's costs escalate linearly with traffic. Statsig's event-based model benefits from economies of scale. High-volume customers often pay 50% less than comparable VWO plans.
VWO's pricing tiers create artificial boundaries between capabilities. The Starter plan limits you to basic targeting. Want AI-powered insights? That requires Pro tier. Need dedicated support? Only available at Enterprise level. Each tier also restricts technical specifications: data retention drops to 30 days on lower plans, and you can only test limited variations.
Statsig eliminates these games. Every customer gets:
Unlimited feature flags
Unlimited experiments
All statistical methods
Full platform capabilities
The only variable is usage - specifically analytics events and session replays. The free tier includes 2 million events monthly, enough for most startups to run comprehensive programs without paying anything.
Let's get specific. A SaaS company with 100,000 monthly active users typically generates:
20 sessions per user
50 analytics events per session
10 feature gate checks per session
On VWO's Pro plan, this volume costs several thousand dollars monthly. Add mobile app testing or advanced targeting, and costs climb higher. The pricing calculator conveniently omits these add-ons until you're deep in negotiations.
With Statsig, the same company might pay nothing. Why? Because Statsig doesn't charge for feature gate checks. Those 2 million gate checks that other platforms monetize? Free on Statsig. This single difference can reduce costs by 70% or more for feature-flag-heavy applications.
"We evaluated Optimizely, LaunchDarkly, Split, and Eppo, but ultimately selected Statsig due to its comprehensive end-to-end integration," said Don Browning, SVP at SoundCloud.
The bundling strategy matters too. VWO sells testing, insights, and personalization as separate products. PostHog charges individually for experimentation, analytics, and feature flags. These unbundled models create budget surprises as teams expand usage across categories.
Getting started with VWO means navigating multiple product modules. You'll set up testing first, then add insights, then configure personalization. Each requires separate onboarding. Teams report weeks of setup before running meaningful experiments.
Statsig's unified platform changes this dynamic. Start with any capability - feature flags, experiments, or analytics - and expand naturally. The SDK integration takes hours, not days. Captions embedded Statsig across iOS, Android, and web platforms within their first sprint. Every subsequent feature ships gated or tested by default.
Small-scale testing rarely stresses infrastructure. But what happens when you're running hundreds of experiments across millions of users? VWO's architecture shows strain at these volumes - response times increase, data processing lags, and costs explode.
Statsig handles hyperscale by design. The same infrastructure processing OpenAI's experiments is available to every customer. No special enterprise tier needed. The platform maintains sub-100ms response times whether you're running 10 experiments or 1,000.
Warehouse-native deployment addresses another enterprise requirement: data sovereignty. Financial services, healthcare, and government clients often can't use cloud-only solutions. Statsig's ability to run entirely within your Snowflake, BigQuery, or Redshift environment solves this constraint.
Fragmented tools create adoption friction. Teams need different training for each VWO module. Knowledge doesn't transfer between products. The result? Slow rollouts and limited usage beyond core champions.
Statsig's integrated approach accelerates adoption. Learn one interface, understand all capabilities. Engineers comfortable with feature flags naturally discover experimentation. Product managers analyzing experiments easily add custom metrics. This cross-pollination drives usage growth.
"Statsig enabled us to ship at an impressive pace with confidence," said Software Engineer Wendy Jiao, noting that a single engineer now handles experimentation tooling that would have once required a team of four.
The results speak volumes. Notion scaled from single-digit to over 300 experiments per quarter after switching. They credit the unified workflow - not just the technology - for this acceleration.
Modern privacy regulations demand careful data handling. GDPR, CCPA, and emerging laws require knowing exactly where user data lives and how it's processed. VWO's cloud-only model complicates compliance for sensitive industries.
Statsig offers multiple deployment options:
Cloud hosted: Fastest setup, Statsig manages infrastructure
Warehouse native: Complete data control, runs in your environment
Hybrid: Feature flags in cloud, analytics in warehouse
Secret Sales chose Statsig specifically for warehouse-native capabilities. They reduced event underreporting from 10% to just 1-2% by eliminating data pipeline complexity. This accuracy improvement alone justified the platform switch.
Experimentation platforms must fit existing workflows, not replace them. VWO provides basic integrations but lacks depth for complex scenarios. Custom implementations often require professional services engagements.
Statsig takes a developer-first approach with 30+ SDKs across every major language. Edge computing support through Cloudflare Workers and Vercel Edge Functions enables microsecond feature flag evaluation. The open-source model means teams can inspect, modify, and contribute improvements.
Real integration goes beyond SDKs though. Statsig connects to your existing data infrastructure:
Stream events from Segment, Rudderstack, or mParticle
Export results to Snowflake, BigQuery, or Databricks
Sync feature flags with Terraform or GitOps workflows
Statsig delivers Facebook-grade experimentation infrastructure without Facebook-sized bills. The platform combines what VWO sells as separate products - testing, analytics, insights - into one integrated system. You get CUPED variance reduction, sequential testing, and warehouse-native deployment in every plan. No tier restrictions. No feature gates.
The customer results demonstrate real impact:
Notion increased experiments from single digits to 300+ quarterly
SoundCloud achieved profitability for the first time in 16 years
Cost advantages compound at scale. While VWO's visitor-based pricing escalates linearly, Statsig's event model provides volume discounts. The pricing analysis shows breakeven around 50,000 MAU - beyond that, Statsig becomes increasingly affordable. Enterprise customers routinely save 50% or more.
The infrastructure handles real scale too. Processing over 1 trillion events daily with 99.99% uptime isn't marketing fluff - it's operational reality for companies like OpenAI, Figma, and Atlassian. This same infrastructure is available whether you're a startup or enterprise.
"Statsig enabled us to ship at an impressive pace with confidence," said Wendy Jiao from Notion.
Perhaps most importantly, Statsig respects your existing investments. The warehouse-native option means keeping your data where it belongs. Open-source SDKs ensure you're never locked in. Transparent SQL access lets you verify every calculation. These architectural choices reflect a fundamental belief: experimentation infrastructure should empower teams, not constrain them.
Choosing an experimentation platform shapes your product development velocity for years. VWO works well for marketing teams testing website variations. But if you're building products across web, mobile, and backend systems - if you need feature management integrated with experimentation - if you want infrastructure that scales with your ambitions - then Statsig provides a compelling alternative.
The unified platform eliminates tool sprawl while the usage-based pricing ensures costs stay reasonable even at scale. More importantly, you get enterprise-grade capabilities from day one. No artificial tier restrictions holding back your experimentation program.
Want to explore further? Check out:
Statsig's pricing calculator for detailed cost comparisons
Customer case studies showing real implementation stories
Technical documentation for SDK integration guides
Hope you find this useful!